Judge Rebukes DOJ Over Withholding Grand Jury Transcripts in Halligan-Comey Case

A federal judge has criticized the Department of Justice for failing to turn over complete transcripts from grand jury proceedings involving former FBI Director James Comey and former federal prosecutor Michael Halligan. The decision marks a significant development in a case that has drawn attention for its political implications and questions about transparency within the Justice Department.

During a hearing this week, the judge stated that prosecutors did not fulfill their legal obligation to provide full and unredacted grand jury materials as ordered by the court. The missing portions, according to court filings, may contain critical testimony that could affect ongoing proceedings related to Halligan’s alleged misconduct during his handling of classified material.

Legal analysts note that the court’s rebuke could pose a setback for the DOJ, which has faced repeated scrutiny over how it manages politically sensitive cases. The judge emphasized that withholding evidence — even inadvertently — undermines confidence in the justice system and could impact the fairness of the trial.

Attorneys for Halligan have argued that the incomplete transcripts hinder their ability to mount a proper defense, accusing prosecutors of selectively providing information that supports their case. They have called for a full disclosure of all grand jury testimony involving Comey and any related witnesses.

The DOJ has not yet provided an explanation for the missing material but has pledged to cooperate with the court’s latest order. Officials are reportedly reviewing internal procedures to determine how the oversight occurred.

The controversy surrounding the Halligan-Comey grand jury testimony adds another layer of complexity to an already tense legal battle that has exposed divisions within the Justice Department. Observers say the judge’s demand for transparency could influence how future high-profile cases are handled, particularly those involving former government officials.

The court is expected to hold another hearing next week to assess the DOJ’s compliance and decide whether further action — including possible sanctions — will be imposed.

Author: M.J