WORLD NEWS FOR MONTENEGRO DIASPORA
Choose language:
Author: M.J.
Montenegro has an almost fully harmonized legal framework with what the European Union's flows, but is a different situation in practice - a professor at the University of Montenegro Vesna Simović-Zvicer, visiting TV E.
"We are still talking to me today, whether there was any salary for overtime, whether it is a respectful working hours of 40 hours per week, and we should also deal with other issues in the 21st century. It is the protection of my dignity in the workplace. So, for what we have, what would say - the work of work because basic workership rights are not respected, we are not dealing with today in developed European countries, "Simovic-Zvicer said" at the end of the day. "
As it explains, there are a lot of examples that show that the situation in practice is different from the legal framework, and an example of these are the events in the public service, regarding the election of the General Manager of Boris Raonić.
"I'm afraid that in some cases there are abuses that are obvious. You mentioned some examples in the announcement. An example of public advertising, an example of the wrong interpretation of the Institute work experience - which is a condition for working attitude and is clearly defined by the Labor Law. Cannot be otherwise defined. Here, let's say, the most obvious example is with the General Director of RTCG. So, we have a situation that a person does not meet the special condition of work experience because there is no and then we have these creative interpretations that are either the result of a huge ignorance or something else, "Simovic-Zvicer said.
The interlocarvary of the TV showed another, as it stated, an important problem, and that is the abuse of the Institute of Taking Office.
"A number of public companies, especially after the government of 2020 has occurred, abuses that institute in order to, very likely, those who eligible to those companies, public institutions, using the acquisition agreement. They are employed in a private company, whether they fictitiously or worked - it is irrelevant, and sign the agreements on taking over, "Simovic-Zvicer explains.
It also states that the inspection of work indicated that irregularity, and that some of them gave them deadlines for those irregularities to be removed.
