WORLD NEWS FOR MONTENEGRO DIASPORA
Choose language:
I believe that for the opposition, not counting minority parties, best to go to two columns in two columns - one in which they would be DPS, SDP and SD, and another list to be composed of entities and individuals who have never been part of this Three used ruling games. Both lists should be clear civil, pro-European and prospects of new, reputable individuals who were not in these parties - was rated by Zlatko Vujović, a political analyst and the Management Board of the Monitoring Center, adding that if, though, though, though, though, though, They can't make two good lists, then it's better to make one quality.
Vujović, commenting on the fact that the Sovereign Parties Moon still knows if they will first occur together or independently in the elections, "Procrnogorski block is in reactions", that the DPS must "say" to say "the disputed staff "That the success of the party in the elections depends on that, and that the SDP and SD should" work on the creation of coalition arrangements "to reduce the risk of rapping voices and remain below the census.
Political parties face two very strong problems. One of them is the consumption of political elites. And that does not only apply to those who are decades in high positions in the ruling or in opposition parties, but also on those who are significantly shorter. The intensity of political events is dramatically higher in Montenegro than in other stable parliamentary democracies. We could say that Montenegro experiences critical events in politics in one year as some stable democracy in five or ten years. Depth of division in society, external mixing in the electoral and political process, non-faulty media reporting, number of criminal character, revenue, openly disrespectful politicians who continue to dominate the political scene, make Voters quickly protect political offers - says Vujović.
He assessed that we are facing trend where one four-year term will be enough to see the voters to see a politician as consumed.
Therefore, it is not surprising that the ruling coalition has lost almost half of the voters in just two and a half years. As not surprised that the opposition parties are faced with a similar major support. Voters simply want a more responsive relationship between the Party, innovation of the political offer, faster replacement of staff spent - played Vujović.
According to him, this was previously understood by the political semi prospirational parties and therefore, as he said, the process of innovation of the political offer is constantly being constantly underway.
New political entities, with a huge number of new people, attract the support of disappointed voters, and it manages to keep critical support of voters to that policy, although it is not the motivation of those who vote - Vujović pointed out.
He said that the procrnogorski block is slow in reactions, and even when there are, as he said, these reactions were always overdue, uncertain.
The best example is the attitude towards European integration. In a situation where the ruling coalition completely blocked the process of European integration, and lost the confidence of European partners, the opposition continues to hold the President of the Committee on European Integration of Branimir Gvozdenović. And then the legitimate question is asked if Gvozdenović is the best that the DPS can offer when it comes to European integration. We are talking about the issue where almost 80 percent of Montenegrin citizens support its EU membership - Vujović pointed out.
He assessed that a lot of missed opposition opposition is in a situation where he has a power that has led to the disintegration, which fails to offer successful policies in one field.
Strategy "We will replace the disputed staff through the candidate list" is too slow, confusing. She was missing a political message that these people need to leave. A legitimate question is set if the president of the DPS felt responsibility after defeating the presidential elections and resigns, what they, who have more contributed to the DPS support in the Parliamentary CLUB, and still working in these positions . They just slow down and prevent the actual changes from happening and reducing the chances of providing a good result in the parliamentary elections. The DPS should smooth forces and tell these people that time is to leave. Success in the elections depends on it. Whether the voters believe that they left. And in order to believe, the message should be clear enough and loud - Vujović pointed out.
When asked which is the best option for sovereignist Parties for extraordinary parliamentary elections, Vujović said that it was a date in two columns.
I believe that for the opposition, without counting minority parties, the best to go in two columns. One in which they would be the DPS, SDP and SD, and the other list composed of entities and individuals who have never been part of these three ever ruling games. Both lists should be clear civil, pro-European and prosper, led by new, reputable individuals who were not in the functions in these parties. The bid of voters must be attractive, innovated, to instill confidence. Having new faces in the list does not mean that they should be individuals for which we all know will resign immediately after the elections, because their careers, say abroad, the possibility of parliamentary work. The citizens need to vote for those who will fight in parliament for their values - Vujović pointed out.
However, he says that the big question is whether another civil list can be made, which could achieve a good result in a short period.
I'm not an optimist if the elections will still be held on June 11th. If I can't make two good lists, then it's better to make one good than two average or bad lists - Vujovic pointed out.
According to him, what burdens this concept is the question of what will happen after the choice with citizens on the list.
Whether they are the bearers of "party" mandates or are a nucleus of a civil club. It is a risk and for the parties. Especially when it comes to funding from the budget. The civic concept of the list is better to attract voters, but carries risks for party interests. On the other hand, if civic candidates should only be "borrowing" the reputation of the parties, that distinguishes them to engage them. This is exactly the biggest problem for this model and the reason why the reputable individuals are hesitating to engage in such initiatives - Vujović pointed out.
Commenting on the possibility of the independent performance of the Savarite Parties, the SDP earned the decision earlier that he would on the elections alone said that possible independent performances carry a lot of risks for SDP and SD.
At this point I would not advise them independent performance. They must work on the creation of coalition arrangements, and reduce the risk that voices remain, and they remain under the census - Vujović pointed out.
He said that the opposition, if still remained in opposition benches, need a common platform, but also that the elections could open a larger space for political actions and achievable coalitions.
Great expectations of citizens a problem for both power and opposition
Zlatko Vujović says that there are a great problem with all parties to great expectations of citizens, primarily when it comes to their standard, as well as their unrealistic optimism that such something will be possible.
Anyone who led the next government will face a huge pressure of voters to fulfill their expectations when it comes to the standard. Continuous borrowing To pump salaries will soon be impossible, and confronting with reality will be very painful, especially for those who led this policy, so "Europe USA", can easily be converted to such policies in Europe never - pointed out Je Vujović.
According to him, such expectations of voters are the problem of both authorities and the opposition.
What better - get in a race with unrealistic promises or invest in a responsible attitude towards voters? This is better better, but also in the short term. It is necessary to opposition to voters to protect their acquired rights when we talk about salaries and pensions, but also a realistic plan to get out of this problem - economic crisis. Especially when the authorities and "Europe USA" have no plan, they already place a bunch of empty promises.
Nevertheless, something is impossible because there are no credible votes from the opposition to deal with economic policies, and no one attacks the efficient authorities and "Europe USA", and even do not invite them to emphasized promises that Vujović pointed out.
He said to the opposition if he wanted to convince the voters that they are the solution, that they are the ones who will protect their acquired rights when it comes to salaries and pensions and prevent the state bankruptcy with a number of release and salary reductions.
"POBJEDA"
